Library:Harm to Nonhuman Animals from AI: a Systematic Account and Framework (research)

This page needs work, for the following reasons(s): Needs completing.

Harm to Nonhuman Animals from AI: a Systematic Account and Framework was published in 2021 by Simon Coghlan, who is a lecturer and researcher at the University of Melbourne. It was published in the journal Conservation Science and Practice.

The report investigates how public attitudes and policy preferences change after shark bite incidents, and how this affects shark conservation efforts. Drawing on literature from media and film studies, psychology, and environmental ethics, the report reviews how media and film narratives shape public perception and policy support for shark conservation. The report then presents the results of a comparative survey study in two locations in Australia: Ballina in New South Wales and Perth in Western Australia. The study examines how public attitudes and policy preferences vary by demographic factors, media exposure, and shark bite experience. The report discusses the implications of the findings for theory and practice, and suggests directions for future research and recommendations for policy makers and stakeholders. The report concludes by emphasizing the need for more evidence-based and humane approaches to shark conservation that consider both human and animal interests.

External links

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-023-00627-6