Ag-gag laws: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ag-gag | {{Needs work|Problem=needs expanding}} | ||
'''Ag-gag laws''' restrict or prohibit the documentation and exposure of animal abuse or mistreatment in agricultural operations. These laws are designed to prevent undercover investigations and whistleblowing by animal welfare activists, journalists, and others who seek to expose animal cruelty and other illegal or unethical practices in the agriculture industry. | |||
Ag-gag laws typically criminalize various forms of conduct related to the investigation and documentation of animal cruelty, such as the recording or photographing of agricultural operations without the owner's consent, the possession or distribution of such recordings, and the misrepresentation of oneself as an employee in order to gain access to an agricultural operation. Violators of these laws may face criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment. | Ag-gag laws typically criminalize various forms of conduct related to the investigation and documentation of animal cruelty, such as the recording or photographing of agricultural operations without the owner's consent, the possession or distribution of such recordings, and the misrepresentation of oneself as an employee in order to gain access to an agricultural operation. Violators of these laws may face criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment. | ||
== Ag-gag laws in Canada == | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ | |||
!Province | |||
!Status | |||
! | |||
! | |||
|- | |||
|Alberta | |||
|Passed (2019) | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Ontario | |||
|Passed (2020) | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Prince Edward Island | |||
|Passed (2020) | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Manitoba | |||
|Passed (2020) | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Canada | |||
|Introduced (2020) | |||
Failed (2021) | |||
Reintroduced (2022) | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
== Ag-gag laws in the United States == | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ | |||
!State | |||
!Code | |||
!Summary | |||
! | |||
|- | |||
|Alabama | |||
|http://alisondb.legislature.state.al.us/alison/codeofalabama/1975/13A-11-153.htm | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Arkansas | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Idaho | |||
|https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title18/T18CH70/SECT18-7042/ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Iowa | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Kansas | |||
|http://www.kslegislature.org/li_2012/b2011_12/statute/047_000_0000_chapter/047_018_0000_article/047_018_0027_section/047_018_0027_k/ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Missouri | |||
|https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=261.099&bid=49547&hl= | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=578.405&bid=30163&hl= | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Montana | |||
|https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0810/chapter_0300/part_0010/section_0030/0810-0300-0010-0030.html | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|North Carolina | |||
|[https://casetext.com/statute/general-statutes-of-north-carolina/chapter-99a-civil-remedies-for-interference-with-property/section-99a-2-recovery-of-damages-for-exceeding-the-scope-of-authorized-access-to-property#:~:text=Section%2099A-2%20-%20Recovery%20of%20damages%20for%20exceeding,operator%20of%20the%20premises%20for%20any%20damages%20sustained. https://casetext.com/statute/general-statutes-of-north-carolina/chapter-99a-civil-remedies-for-interference-with-property/section-99a-2-recovery-of-damages-for-exceeding-the-scope-of-authorized-access-to-property#:~:text=Section%2099A-2%20-%20Recovery%20of%20damages%20for%20exceeding,operator%20of%20the%20premises%20for%20any%20damages%20sustained.] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|North Dakota | |||
|https://ndlegis.gov/cencode/t12-1c21-1.pdf#nameddest=12p1-21p1-02 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Utah | |||
|https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title76/Chapter6/76-6-S112.html?v=C76-6-S112_1800010118000101 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Wyoming | |||
|https://wyoleg.gov/statutes/compress/title06.pdf<nowiki/>https://wyoleg.gov/statutes/compress/title40.pdf | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Farm animal welfare standards comparison by country]] | |||
[[Category:Animal law]] | [[Category:Animal law]] | ||
[[Category:Farm animals]] | [[Category:Farm animals]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:27, 9 October 2023
 | This page needs work, for the following reasons(s): needs expanding. |
Ag-gag laws restrict or prohibit the documentation and exposure of animal abuse or mistreatment in agricultural operations. These laws are designed to prevent undercover investigations and whistleblowing by animal welfare activists, journalists, and others who seek to expose animal cruelty and other illegal or unethical practices in the agriculture industry.
Ag-gag laws typically criminalize various forms of conduct related to the investigation and documentation of animal cruelty, such as the recording or photographing of agricultural operations without the owner's consent, the possession or distribution of such recordings, and the misrepresentation of oneself as an employee in order to gain access to an agricultural operation. Violators of these laws may face criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment.
Ag-gag laws in Canada
| Province | Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Alberta | Passed (2019) | ||
| Ontario | Passed (2020) | ||
| Prince Edward Island | Passed (2020) | ||
| Manitoba | Passed (2020) | ||
| Canada | Introduced (2020)
Failed (2021) Reintroduced (2022) |